Defending the Theistic View

The Myth of Jesus: A Refutation of the Zeitgeist — Part 5

The fifth pagan deity that Zeitgeist points out as a god much like Jesus was a very interesting one to look into, mostly because I ran into a brick wall while researching him. Unlike Horus, Dionysus, or even Krishna, there isn’t much information about Mithras. What information we do have about him is very imperfect and is based largely on educated guess work rather than on hard fact. However, it is not uncommon to find claims made about him on unreliable, unacademic conspiracy websites.

As for the claims made by Peter Joseph in Zeitgeist are,

Mithra, of Persia, born of a virgin on December 25th, he had 12 disciples and performed miracles, and upon his death was buried for 3 days and thus resurrected, he was also referred to as “The Truth,” “The Light,” and many others. Interestingly, the sacred day of worship of Mithra was Sunday.

Mithraism began to be practiced by Romans in the late first century A.D., but it didn’t enjoy widespread membership until the mid-second century A.D. — On the internet, I ran across claims about the existence of “mithraic scriptures,” but, in reality, there are no such known writtings. Being a “mystery religion,” there are no sacred writings of the cult like there are in other ancient religions such as Christianity, Hunduism and Buddhism. It is also doubtful that any such sacred texts ever existed.

mithras_bullThere exists the popular misconception that Christianity and Mithraism were in bitter competition for the heat and soul of the Roman empire. — This is not true! The truth is that the Roman cult of Mithraism only allowed men to join while excluding women. Christianity, being much more open to membership, was therefore at an advantage. Also, despite the fact that several Roman emperors were initiates in the cult of Mithras it was never instated as the official Roman religion.

The claim that Mithras was born on December 25th seems to be relevant, however as pointed out in previous posts, this date has no relevance to the origins of Christianity since it was in the forth century in which it was instituted. The claim that he was born of a virgin is false since he was born by being forced out of a rock. I guess someone could make the argument that a rock is a virgin, but to argue that is relevant is absurd. As for claims that Mithras performed miracles, this is too generic to be of any relevance since miracles are to be expected in theistic and polytheistic religion. — There is no reference I could find that shows him having twelve disciples. It’s important to consider that Mithras didn’t travel, so he would have had no traveling companions.

Zeitgeist’s claim that Mithras was dead for three days and then resurrected is demonstrably false. Mithras did not die, and therefore was not resurrected. He simply ascended to heaven in the Sun’s chariot after killing the bull. When in heaven, he has a meal with the Sun in which they eat the meat of the bull that he killed. — Since he was said to have killed the bull right before he ascended to heaven, there is therefore no time for him to have died and resurrected.

On the surface, the mithraic holy day being Sunday would seem relevant, but that goes without taking into account that Jesus and the first Christians were, in facts, Jews meaning they celebrated the Sabbath on Saturday rather than Sunday. To make matters worse, we really don’t know on what days Mithraic rituals took place, so this partucular claim really should not be made, despite its constant repetition. — Also, having been raised as a Seventh-Day Adventist, this objection is even less affective on me than on most other Christians.

In summary, the alleged similarities between Jesus and Mithras as mentioned by Zeitgeist are mostly false. But even if the parallels were real, they would still be fail to demonstrate causation . . . due to to the time when Mithraism appears in the Roman empire. The Encyclopedia Britannica says,

There is little notice of the Persian god in the Roman world until the beginning of the 2nd century, but, from the year AD 136 onward, there are hundreds of dedicatory inscriptions to Mithra. This renewal of interest is not easily explained. The most plausible hypothesis seems to be that Roman Mithraism was practically a new creation, wrought by a religious genius who may have lived as late as c. AD 100 and who gave the old traditional Persian ceremonies a new Platonic interpretation that enabled Mithraism to become acceptable to the Roman world.

And as a final word, it has been suggested from this that rather than Christianity borrowing from Mithraism, the borrowing may have been the reverse. However, others suppose that neither religion borrowed from the other, prefering the possibility that the similarities that do exist between Christianity and Mithraism may be explained as having their origins in the Greco-Oriental mindset of the time. Either hypothesis is prefered, Zeitgeist’s implication that Jesus was an imitation of Mithras is less supported then it supposes. One pagan researcher (not a Christian apologist) I’ve read on this subject concludes, “Did Christianity steal from Mithraism? Most definitely not.”

The Catholic Encyclopedia Mithraism.
Mithra & Mithraism: The Legend of Mithras
What Mithraism Isn’t
Encyclopedia Britannica, Mithraism.
The Cult of Mithras. UNRV History.

Further Reading:
Epologetics: Debunking the Jesus-Mithra Myth
Was the story of Jesus stolen from that of the Persian deity Mithra?, by J.P. Holding
Mithras: Mithraism and Christianity from SkepticWiki

9 responses

  1. xyz

    I’m just reading the article. Just wanted to say that you talk of the Roman Mithra while Zeitgeist says: Mithra of Persia.

    January 17, 2009 at 3:43 pm

  2. krissmith777

    xyz says:

    “I’m just reading the article. Just wanted to say that you talk of the Roman Mithra while Zeitgeist says: Mithra of Persia.”

    I realize that. But the reason Zeitgeist uses that terminology is because it uses OUTDATED infomation to assiciate the two.

    It should also be mentioned that NOT EVEN the Persian Mithra fits the Criterea for Jesus. For example, unlike Jesus, the PERSIAN Mithra was BORN OF INCEST, NOT OF A VIRGIN.

    January 17, 2009 at 8:46 pm

  3. xyz

    Incest? That’s a new version to me. I tried to read up about the Mithra cult earlier today, and I actually found 2 versions with a virgin, but one dating to the 4th century ad, and the other one was apparently mixed up with another story. The more I read, the more confused I get. But actually I don’t really care.

    The reason why I pointed this out was because Israel was a lot closer to Iraq and Iran than the center of the Roman Empire and insofar more likely to get in contact with a Persian religion.

    Anyway, I’m not here to defend Zeitgeist (although I’m an atheist). In fact I made a post against Zeitgeist yesterday and looked some things up afterwards, that’s how I stumbled upon this site. 🙂

    January 18, 2009 at 2:02 am

  4. krissmith777


    Good to know that you have been doing your own research.

    REading up on Mithraism is a dificult thing to do because a lot of what we thought we knew about it has turned out to be misinterpratations.

    All we DO know about is based on Mithraic art. The practitioners of the religion didn’t write down their beliefs, hence the term “Mystery Cult.”

    For the last 2 decased, what we “knew” about the cult has been under reevaluation.

    January 18, 2009 at 5:39 pm

  5. Tim The wonder

    At last a Seventh Day Adventist, I’m also a SDA, and just watched the movie and am glad that someone in our community is taking this seriously, I actually felt I was going mad if we couldn’t disprove these outrages claims. Guess its true when in the Bible it says that it will deceive even the elect, it is already doing so, but not for me it isn’t.

    Thanks for the insight,

    Will do my bit in researching, be sure of it.

    April 8, 2009 at 2:09 pm

  6. Pingback: Paralleling Jesus and Mithras « Non-Pagan Roots of Christianity

  7. Pingback: Parallels between Jesus and Mithras « Non-Pagan Roots of Christianity

  8. Pingback: The Parallels between Jesus and Mithras « Non-Pagan Roots of Christianity

  9. Lupita

    Thank you so much for posting.
    I too was trying to figure out how to answer questions from non believing friends and claimed they had “proof” of these things through the zeitgeist website, and I said, no i dont want their link, I want the actual books.
    sent it to my church to see if they can help with answers
    glad you posted this. thank you so much!
    decievers are real good! but nothing can beat the truth =)

    June 25, 2010 at 5:24 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s